Contrasting Mobile Revenue Models of Apple And Google

Astute Horace Dediu puts things in perspective:

See Also:

Android economics: An introduction

The Android Income Statement

Android Revenues in Perspective

Android’s contribution to Google

Calculating Google’s contribution to iPhone profitability

Steven Troughton-Smith has written a fantastic post on an early Android phone from 2007. Here are some of my highlights:

When Google first showed off Android, they showed it running on a device very similar to Blackberries or Nokia E-class devices of the time. This device was the Google Sooner - an OMAP850 device built by HTC, with no touchscreen or WiFi. This was the Android reference device, the device they originally built the OS on.

In short, the phone was a Blackberry rip-off. 

HTC EXCA 300

I thought it would be interesting to take you on a brief tour of the OS. The build of Android this is running was built on May 15th 2007 - four months after the iPhone was announced; the first M3 version of Android was announced in November 2007, and Android 1.0 didn’t come ‘till a year later.

The Google Sooner, aka the HTC EXCA 300, runs on an OMAP850 with 64MB RAM, and comes in two colors: black, and white. It has a 320x240 LCD screen (non touch) and a 1.3 megapixel camera sensor on the back, which supports video recording. Its curvy profile is surprisingly light and has a certain quality to it. It has a full QWERTY keyboard, a four-way d-pad, four system buttons (menu, back, home, and favourites) and call/end call buttons. Inside is a 2G radio, which is capable of EDGE speeds, but no WiFi or 3G. It has a mini-SD slot (not micro-SD), and a mini-USB port.

…..

It was an OS designed to search Google from the very start.


He wraps up his post by saying:

It’s quite clear that Android was being designed to a completely different target before the iPhone was released.What we see here would have fitted in perfectly with the world of Symbian and BlackBerry. This early build of Android is in fact even less capable and mature than the 2004 release of Symbian Series 90 (Hildon), the OS that runs on the Nokia 7700 and 7710 - Nokia’s first, and only, pre-iPhone touchscreen smartphones. It’s not hard to see that iPhone really changed the thinking across the entire industry, and caused everybody to start from scratch. Android, webOS, Windows Phone 7, Windows 8, BlackBerry 10 - all of these exist because of the iPhone, and standing on its shoulders they have made some amazing and unique contributions to the ecosystem.

As I mentioned in my Úll talk last week, the moment we saw the iPhone for the first time it was so clear that everything beyond this point would be completely different - it wasn’t just about smartphones, it was about the future of computing. We live in a world that would have seemed distantly futuristic only 5 years ago, thanks to all these OSes. It’s amazing how far we’ve come in such a short time, and I can’t wait to see what comes next.

Google was following a red-ocean strategy before Apple wowed the world with the iPhone by following a blue-ocean strategy. Love it or hate it but the fact of the matter is the iPhone was a rising tide that lifted all boats. 

Google’s Current Mobile Revenue Model

Google’s Future Mobile Revenue Model = Google branded Motorola devices + The Current Mobile Revenue Model. 

The Truth About Google Glasses. 


There’s is a fine line between dreams and reality. 

Charles Arthur:

Android generated less than $550m in revenues for Google between 2008 and the end of 2011, if figures provided by the search giant as part of a settlement offer with Oracle ahead of an expected patent and copyright infringement trial are an accurate guide.

The figures also suggest that Apple devices such as the iPhone, which use products such as its Maps as well as Google Search in its Safari browser, generated more than four times as much revenue for Google as its own handsets in the same period.

Android is Winning. 

Read More

Henry Blodget:

Like most people who work at Google, Steve Jobs was brilliant, but he likely never would have been able to get hired at Google.  The Google hiring algorithm would have taken one look at his flaky educational background and concluded that he would never have amounted to anything.

Steve Jobs’s genius, in other words, was a sort of genius that Google places little or no value on.

But if Google is to become a beloved mass-market brand, it’s also the sort of genius that Google needs a lot more of. And the place to find that genius is probably not the country’s most prestigious computer engineering programs.

Read More

Jan 9, 2007: Remembering Steve Jobs’ Greatest Keynote Presentation

On January 9, 2007 Steve Jobs Introduced the iPhone to the world at Macword 2007 ( iPhone went on Sale in the United States on June 29, 2007). Apple redefined the way the smart-phones should work on that historic day. The keynote was Steve Jobs’ greatest presentation and he had that self-satisfied smirk of a man who knew that the product he was introducing to the world was way ahead of the competition. Great men help create great products that that outlives them and Steve Jobs created not one but many during his life-time. 

Macworld 2007 Keynote (iPhone Introduction):

P.S. Apple and Google were partners at the time and this keynote bought back some painful reminders of how Trojan Horse Eric Schmidt (Then an Apple Board Member) and Google backstabbed Apple by introducing Android in 2008. Early Android Prototypes looked like Blackberry phones but Google later decided to shamelessly copy the core concepts of iPhone because it was way ahead of what RIM was doing at the time. I’ll never forgive Google for betraying Apple. 

See Also:

Five Year of iPhone - Apple Insider

What Googles Android Looked Like Before And After The Launch Of The iPhone

New Year’s Resolutions for 2012

I had a good chuckle while reading this piece.

Forbes yesterday published its annual list of most powerful people in the world. The list includes 70 people. United States President Barack Obama tops the list. 

Tech People on the list:

Microsoft Founder Bill Gates is at No. 5, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is at No. 9, Jeffrey Inmelt of GE is at No. 28, Google twins Larry Page and Sergey Brin are at 30, Jeff Bezos of Amazon is at 40, Robin Li of Baidu is at 42 and Apple CEO Tim Cook makes the list for the 1st time at No. 58. I’m sure Tim Cook will be ranked a lot higher next year. 

See Also:

Gallery - The World’s Most Powerful People

Forbes’ Methodology

Steve Jobs’ Rant against Android: 

"I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong," Jobs said, according to the AP. "I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this."

You can read the full piece here.

I have nothing but utter disdain for the Android OS. I will never use an Android phone in my life even if i get one for free. I’m not a big fan of Microsoft but i applaud them for coming up with something original while designing Windows Phone 7. 

Jobs’ Apple specializes in delighting the most discriminating, hard-to-please customers. Page’s Google specializes in satisfying the least discriminating customers: the long tail; the automatable; and those that can’t complain because the Google product or service is free.

Read More. 

I’m an Apple Fanboy so i’m posting the story behind Apple’s name here and it goes like this:

 Apple’s company name is said to have been chosen for co-founder Steve Jobs’ favourite fruit, and the logo is a play on the world byte. In the book, Apple 2.0 Steve Wozniak is quoted as saying:

“He [Jobs] said ‘I’ve got a great name: Apple Computer.’ Maybe he worked in apple trees. I didn’t even ask. Maybe it had some other meaning to him. Maybe the idea just occurred based upon Apple Records. He had been a musical person, like many technical people are. It might have sounded good partly because of that connotation. I thought instantly, ‘We’re going to have a lot of copyright problems.’

Both Wozniak and Jobs tried other alternate names such as Executex and Matrix Electronics, but they didn’t like it as much as Apple Computers. And the name was born.

They also wanted an approachable name. Like Amiga, Apple wanted to shy away from the cold, corporate names of other computer companies at the time.  Apple also went on to influence other company name decisions, including the UK based company, Apricot Computers.

Click here to read about the stories behind names like Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Sony etc.

[via TheNextWeb]

I’ve not been a huge Google fan since the launch of Android but that doesn’t stop me appreciating the awesomeness of today’s doodle.

Here’s an Excerpt from the article:

Doodler Jennifer Hom was the brains behind the elaborate doodle, which was a team effort. She and other illustrators spent about three months putting the whole thing together. They even studied a bunch of old Queen albums and videos to pick out visual cues.

"My obsession with Freddie Mercury affected everyone else around me," she said.

They decided to go with the song “Don’t Stop Me Now” because it’s one of Queen’s top 10 hits of all time, plus Mercury actually wrote it.